Sign in
VerbalReading Comprehension

Free GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Question

PrepLattice is an independent test-preparation service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by GMAC, the organization that administers the GMAT. GMAT and GMAT Focus are trademarks of GMAC, used here only to name the exam this question is designed to prepare you for.

When astronomers measure how fast stars orbit within a spiral galaxy, they find a result that ordinary physics does not predict. Stars near the visible edge move just as quickly as those farther in, even though the galaxy's visible matter thins out toward the rim. By the familiar laws of gravity, the outer stars should lag behind. Something appears to be holding them at high speed, and explaining what has split researchers into two main approaches.

The first and more widely held approach posits unseen matter. On this view, each galaxy is embedded in a vast halo of so-called dark matter, made of particles that emit no light but exert gravity. The extra mass supplies the pull needed to keep the outer stars moving fast. Supporters point out that the same hidden mass would also explain how clusters of galaxies hold together.

The second approach proposes instead that the law of gravity itself behaves differently at the very low accelerations found in a galaxy's outskirts. By modifying the law rather than adding matter, this account reproduces the flat orbital speeds without invoking any unseen particles. Critics counter that such a modification, while neat for single galaxies, struggles to explain larger structures that the dark-matter halo handles easily. No detection of a dark-matter particle has yet settled the contest.

Which of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

Five fresh questions every day, your progress tracked, every miss explained. Free with an account.

Answer & Explanation

Correct answer

B

Main idea question. The passage centers on an unexpected pattern in how stars orbit within spiral galaxies (outer stars moving as fast as inner ones, against what gravity alone predicts) and lays out two competing explanations that remain unsettled. That matches (B).

(A) and (E) both contradict facts the passage states directly: no dark-matter particle has actually been detected, and dark matter is described as emitting no light. (C) reverses the passage's central observation, since outer stars move just as fast as inner ones rather than more slowly as gravity alone would predict. (D) overstates the second, modified-gravity approach, since the passage notes that this approach struggles to explain larger structures that the dark-matter account handles more easily, not that it explains every known structure better.